3D-first detail engineering for shipyards and owners. AVEVA Marine and AVEVA Draw, NX for hull, structural FEM in-house. Active scopes with Helsinki Shipyard on NB520 and NB521 Arctic Security Cutter for the USCG, Davie on Polar Max, Astican on Naumon wingsail retrofit.
Marine detail engineering breaks when the disciplines are scattered. We keep piping, HVAC, electrical, structural, outfitting and accommodation in the same 3D model with the same project owner. The yard receives a single coordinated handover, not six PDF packs that contradict each other.
Routing, isometrics, supports, MTOs. AVEVA Marine for class-approved isometric extraction. Coordination with mechanical equipment placement.
Duct routing, plenum sizing, fire damper placement, accommodation supply and exhaust calculations. SOLAS-compliant fire-zone segregation.
Cable routing, tray layout, panel placement, instrument index. Integration with control system supplier deliverables.
Block-based structural detail, foundations for equipment, FEM analysis for critical structures. Outfitting interfaces under same coordination team.
Submission packages for Bureau Veritas, DNV, ABS, Lloyd's Register, RINA. Comment cycles managed end-to-end.
Distributed teams walk the live 3D model on HoloLens 2. Owner, yard and Class on the same model, faster than any video review.
Multi-discipline detail engineering for the Arpaarti Arctica newbuild at Helsinki Shipyard. Reference project for our Vigo-Mumbai delivery team.
Detail engineering work for the Polar Max icebreaker programme at Davie Shipbuilding, Quebec. Cross-Atlantic delivery from Vigo.
Structural and outfitting retrofit engineering for the Naumon wingsail installation. Class approval and yard execution support.
Onboard CO₂ capture pilot installation on a ferry. Marine detail engineering applied to our own carbon-capture product.
Case study: structural support design for exhaust scrubber retrofit. FEM analysis of dynamic loads and fatigue verification.
FEM fatigue analysis of a fishing-vessel bow mast under combined loads. Case study with method and verification.
A shipyard does not need a complete ship at once. It needs block N ready for steel-cutting on date X, with all disciplines coordinated. We organise detail engineering against the construction schedule, not against an internal engineering schedule that ignores the yard.
Construction plan, block split, key date freeze. Our delivery plan inherits the yard's logic.
General arrangement, structural concept, system schematics. Class-approved BE package.
Detail design delivered block by block, in construction sequence. Cross-discipline coordination per block, not per ship.
Engineering presence on-site during steel-cutting, outfitting and integration. RFI cycle managed in real time.
As-built model update, final Class documentation, owner manual integration.
Where each tool wins, where each breaks, and how we mix them on the same project without losing the model.
What worked, what did not, and the four process changes we made for the Arctic Security Cutter newbuild.
Two years of holö on a live newbuild. The 30 % efficiency claim quantified with project measurements.